Ninja Build Alternatives

Ninja Build Alternatives

Posted in Software

11 best ninja build alternatives for Windows, Mac, Linux, iPhone, Android and more. Ninja Build alternative list source: ninja-build.org

10 alternativesFree, Open Source Linux, Mac, Windows, Chrome
Website

Compare Ninja Build alternatives

Compare top-ranked Ninja Build alternatives by score, license, and supported platforms.

AlternativeScoreLicensePlatforms
CMake90% 48 votesFree, Open SourceWindows, Mac, Linux
GNU Make73% 26 votesFree, Open SourceWindows, Mac, Linux
SCons77% 22 votesFree, Open SourceWindows, Mac, Linux
Ant60% 20 votesFree, Open SourceWindows, Mac, Linux
Premake78% 18 votesFree, Open SourceWindows, Mac, Linux
Waf25% 8 votesFree, Open SourceWindows, Mac, Linux
Qmake43% 7 votesFree, Open SourceWindows, Mac, Linux
Automake100% 7 votesFree, Open SourceLinux
Tup50% 6 votesFree, Open SourceWindows, Mac, Linux
Setup.shl50% 5 votesFree, Open SourceChrome, Mac, Linux
2

48

5

CMake

Score: 90%

FreeOpen SourceWindowsMacLinux
More
CMake, testing, and software package is designed to be a vehicle for a family. CMake is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Windows,Linux,Haiku
4

26

7

GNU Make

Score: 73%

FreeOpen SourceWindowsMacLinux
More
Do not put the executable files and other source files of a program from the program source code files is a tool which controls the generation of. Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Windows,Linux,BSD,Cygwin
6

22

5

SCons

Score: 77%

FreeOpen SourceWindowsMacLinux
More
Open source software construction tool SCons build generation tool. Expanded to SCons is a classic cross-think of them as an alternative Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Windows,Linux
8

20

8

Ant

Score: 60%

FreeOpen SourceWindowsMacLinux
More
Apache Ant (software development) is an open-source Java-based build tool. To explain the structure and uses XML files to control the creation. Most of the actions are Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Windows,Linux
10

18

4

Premake

Score: 78%

FreeOpen SourceWindowsMacLinux
More
Describe your software project just once, a quick and easy configuration, structure, syntax, reading, and simple and easy to built with Freemake everywhere. Generate Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Windows,Linux
12

8

6

Waf

Score: 25%

FreeOpen SourceWindowsMacLinux
More
Waf configure, compile and install Python-based framework applications. Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Windows,Linux,Xcode,Eclipse
14

7

4

Qmake

Score: 43%

FreeOpen SourceWindowsMacLinux
More
The process of the creation of a development-project qmake on different platforms of a company, the QT is a tool that helps to facilitate. qmake automates the generation of makefiles Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Windows,Linux
16

7

0

Automake

Score: 100%

FreeOpen SourceLinux
More
Automake making GNU program that produces portable makefiles for use of the compilation software used programming tool. Features:Free,Open,Source,Linux
18

6

3

Tup

Score: 50%

FreeOpen SourceWindowsMacLinux
More
Pipe, Linux, OS X and windows for building a file base system. File changes and DAG is a directed acyclic graph on the shortlist, and then perform the MOUNT operations Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Windows,Linux
20

5

5

Setup.shl

Score: 50%

FreeOpen SourceChromeMacLinux
More
A pure bash tool/library can be combined to explain the impressive useful to the process of building. Features:Free,Open,Source,Mac,Linux,Chrome,OS

Ninja Build alternatives FAQ

What is the best Ninja Build alternative?

CMake is currently the top-ranked option on this list based on community votes and item score.

Are there free Ninja Build alternatives?

Yes. Free, freemium, or open-source options in this list include CMake, GNU Make, SCons, Ant, Premake.

Which platforms are covered?

The alternatives in this list include options for Linux, Mac, Windows, Chrome, depending on each product.

How are alternatives ranked?

Alternatives are ordered by community voting signals, item score, and the available product details collected for each option.

Comments